determinants of upper class status among non- ispanic immigrant groups in the united states

historically, the majority of immigrants to the united states came from european countries. the 1965 immigration reform act (ira) fundamentally changed the configuration of immigrants to the united states. the largest immigrant communities now consist of latin americans, asians, and africans. another important development in immigrant communities in the past few decades has been the growth of a disproportionately large upper class in non-hispanic immigrant communities. in this study, i will investigate the determinants of upper class status with a focus on non-hispanic immigrants in the united states. i have used a theoretical framework consisting of a wide spectrum of social theories. the theoretical framework encompasses demographic and structural factors, assimilation theory, weberian theory, elite theories, and marxian theory. from this wide spectrum of theories, i have developed a set of five exogenous variables and another 10 control variables including key socio-demographic variables metropolitan area, region, the number of hours worked, immigration from an english speaking country, citizenship status, the length of stay in the united states, occupational status, occupational prestige, educational attainment, private schooling, and employment status. consequently, i have analyzed the influence of the key independent variables on upper class status attainment among non-hispanic immigrants in the united states. the current study has utilized secondary data analysis from the 2010 american community survey (acs). bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the relationship among study variables. the results of this study have revealed that structural and demographic factors make up the largest share of influence on upper class status attainment among non-hispanic immigrants in the united states. the most influential variables emerged as “hours worked” ( = 0.211), “educational attainment” ( = 0.174), and “marital status” ( = 0.119), respectively.